Song of the Week - "Smooth" by Santana ft. Rob Thomas - This is NOT 1999.

10.21.25

Song of the Week - "Smooth" by Santana ft. Rob Thomas - This is NOT 1999.

Share

The guitar-slinging legend Carlos Santana went mainstream in the summer of ’99 with a little help from Matchbox Twenty’s Rob Thomas. “Smooth,” off Santana’s Supernatural, hit Billboard #1 by October. The track is our SOTW as we stroll down memory lane to the dot-com era. Recent hot takes calling today’s market “1999 all over again” sparked this note. Our view: this is not the end of the AI revolution - it’s the start.

Man, it’s a hot one…

Like seven inches from the midday sun…

Well, I hear you whisper, and the words melt everyone

But you stay so cool

Lately it feels like an epidemic of “bubble” and “recession” calls. Click-bait skews negative, and we’ve been on “bubble watch” for decades. There will be drawdowns - there always are. In 2022, the Nasdaq dropped roughly 50%. In 2025, markets digested a “DeepSeek moment” and an April tariff shock (“Liberation Day”). Yet innovation cycles don’t end because headlines get loud.

So, is this 1999 - and should investors fear a 50%+ collapse? Big falls typically pair with recessions. The better near-term question: Are we staring at a >20% decline in the next 3–6 months? Let’s turn to the data.

2025 vs. 1999 - What’s similar (and what’s not)

IPO Heat:

  • 1999: 480 U.S. IPOs. WilmerHale
  • 2025 (YTD): ~278 IPOs through Oct 11 - busy, but nowhere near 1999’s mania. StockAnalysis

Tech index surge:

  • 1999: Nasdaq Composite up ~84–86% for the year (Nasdaq 100 was ~+100%). StatMuse+1
  • 2025 (YTD): Nasdaq up ~16–17% through early October - not a melt-up. StatMuse+1

Rates backdrop (10-yr UST):

  • 1999: ~6% area. MacroTrends
  • Today (Oct 13, 2025): ~4.07% intraday - meaningfully lower carrying cost. Investing.com

Fed stance:

  • 1999: The Fed hiked several times.
  • 2025: So far two cuts, with officials signaling openness to more if the labor market softens. Markets mostly price additional easing.

What that means

Valuations are elevated in parts of AI, but the macro scaffolding is different from 1999: fewer IPOs, a far smaller tech blow-off, lower long rates, and a Fed now easing (vs. tightening into a frenzy). The tape will wobble - trade policy headlines alone have created 2–4% daily swings this month - but the setup isn’t the same powder keg.

Our take

  • A standard-issue correction (10–15%) is always on the table, especially with trade noise and lofty winners. 
  • A >20% drawdown likely needs a growth scare or policy error that bleeds into earnings. 
  • A 1999-style 50% collapse generally pairs with a recession

Bottom line

This is not the end of the AI revolution; it’s the beginning of a multi-year investment cycle. The market will correct from time to time, but the setup lacks the hallmarks of 1999’s blow-off. The only thing truly ’90s about this moment is the song - because it’s still so smooth.

As someone that was in the thick of the madness on Wall Street and then San Franciso in the nineties - take it from me - this is not 1999 - yet.

 

Lear Investment Management (“LIM”) is a Registered Investment Advisor based in Dallas, Texas and registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration does not imply a certain level of skills or training. This content is an example of past analysis performed by LIM, is for informational purposes only, contains the observations and opinions of LIM, is not intended to provide investment advice, and should not be relied upon for investment decisions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results and information pertaining to LIM’s processes is subject to change at any time without notice.

This document is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. The information contained herein is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, investment advice. The views and opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any SEC registered investment firm.

Investing in digital assets, including Bitcoin, involves a high degree of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. The value of digital assets can be extremely volatile and may be affected by various factors, including regulatory developments, market conditions, and technological advancements. Investors should conduct their own research and consult with their financial advisors before making any investment decisions.

WilmerHaleStockAnalysisStatMuse+1StatMuse+1MacroTrendsInvesting.com